Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philip Sekulic vs James Kent Trotter Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sekulic vs Trotter analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Sekulic vs James Kent Trotter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sekulic 1 - 0 Trotter
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sekulic has won 50.79% of points on his second serve, while Trotter has won 49.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sekulic, in recent form, has won 49.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Trotter has won 44.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.94% and 28.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sekulic has saved 63.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Trotter has saved 61.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sekulic has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 45/ 36), with Trotter winning 56.14% (W/L 32/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sekulic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Trotter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 20/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Sekulic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 28/ 26), where as Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 28/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sekulic winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sekulic winning 2 and Trotter winning 1. The last match between Sekulic and Trotter was at the Granby Challenger, 22-07-2023, Semifinals, Hard with Philip Sekulic getting the victory 6-4 2-6 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sekulic and Trotter have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sekulic winning 1 times and Trotter 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sekulic winning 1, and Trotter 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sekulic has played against opponents with an average rank of 260.77 while Trotter has played against players with an average rank of 309.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sekulic has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Trotter has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sekulic has converted 40.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Trotter has converted 41.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
238
Rank
238
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
371
Rank
371
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
56% (93-74)
Career Total W/L
56% (62-48)
50% (17-17)
YTD W/L
52% (13-12)
$92,390
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Philip Sekulic | James Kent Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:25:10 | 2:25:10 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (65/102) | 65% (51/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (45/65) | 76% (39/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (20/37) | 64% (18/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 28% (22/79) | 36% (37/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Philip Sekulic
Player
James Kent Trotter
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philip Sekulic | James Kent Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (17/17) | 52% (13/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (40/40) | 51% (27/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (404/401) | 52% (282/257) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (17/14) | 50% (6/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.72 |
| Aces Total | 159 | 191 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 102 | 83 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:55 | 1:35:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 331.59 | 293.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1599/2611) | 58% (951/1638) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1122/1599) | 77% (731/951) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (514/1012) | 50% (346/687) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (86/212) | 42% (48/115) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (943/2538) | 35% (539/1544) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (17/15) | 52% (13/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (17/34) | 50% (12/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 47% (8/17) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (19/4) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 15% (13/2) |
Philip Sekulic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Philip Sekulic
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
61 of
87)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
129)
10
Aces
27
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
59 of
77)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
0%
(
0 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
28 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
43 of
129)
119
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Robert Strombachs
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
17
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
23 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Hamish Stewart
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Philip Sekulic
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Remy Bertola
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
54%
(
70 of
129)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
53 of
129)
119
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Brandon Holt
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
110)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Philip Sekulic
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
14
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
87
Total Points Won
88
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Alafia Ayeni
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
James Kent Trotter
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
4
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hiroki Moriya
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
James Kent Trotter
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sekulic Vs Trotter Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
